2019-09-28 Disruption

@bgcarlisle wrote On techbros in healthcare and medical research about “disrupting an industry” and summarized it as follows:

For future reference, whenever a techbro talks about “disrupting an industry,” they mean: “replicating an already existing industry, but subsidizing it heavily with venture capital, and externalizing its costs at the expense of the public or potential workers by circumventing consumer-, worker- or public-protection laws in order to hopefully undercut the competition long enough to bring about regulatory capture.”

I mean, I don’t mind people taking venture capital again and again and finally failings. That’s ok. What I am troubled by is when they go so much venture capital that they get the power to hurt innocents. The medallion system for taxis might have been corrupt, but do we really need to drive all the taxi drivers out of business to make that point? To then get a monopoly and enjoy rentier capitalism? That is a failure state! This is not what I want.

Tags:

Comments


Please make sure you contribute only your own work, or work licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Note: in order to facilitate peer review and fight vandalism, we will store your IP number for a number of days. See Privacy Policy for more information. See Info for text formatting rules. You can edit the comment page if you need to fix typos. You can subscribe to new comments by email without leaving a comment.

To save this page you must answer this question:

Please say HELLO.