Yeah… Spam… RSS Search

2015-03-10 Fighting Wiki Spam

I recently wrote something about fighting Emacs Wiki spam on Google+.


Lauren said “I’m hoping we can stay focused on practical processes and solutions that are workable at very large scales.” This post is about a wiki that is popular but not as popular as Wikipedia.

I’ve been running Emacs Wiki for a while now. It’s definitely not “at very large scales” but it was certainly a step up from all my previous wiki efforts. I got started back on the Portland Pattern Repository and Meatball Wiki and so I kept trying to live up to Soft Security. That’s why Emacs Wiki still doesn’t have logins and passwords for ordinary users. There are passwords for roles that allow you to lock pages and to edit locked pages, for example.


The first line of defense I added was rolling back edits. The first wiki I used allowed you to edit an old revision and save it (click history link, click good revision, scroll to bottom, click edit link, scroll to bottom, click save button). I wanted to speed up the clean up. Now you you click history link and click the rollback button.

The remaining features are reserved for administrators.

→ Wiki Spam

Banning URLs by regexp

We are mostly getting link spam. Therefore I soon introduced a list of regular expressions (on a locked page that I could edit together with my co-administrators). In order to speed this up, I added some code to rollbacks. If the rollback removed URLs from the page text, those are listed and you automatically get a form where you can write a regular expression based on the list you’re seeing. Clicking the submit button will add this regular expression to the ban list.

→ Banned Content

Banning IP numbers

This is a very crude measure. Luckily enough, it still works often enough. Perfect for defense in depth. I added more code to rollbacks. After a rollback, administrators are presented with a link to “ban contributors”. If you click on it, you’re presented with the editors of recent page revisions, together with a note indicating whether they have been banned or not. You can check the IP numbers of the contributors not yet banned and click a button to add an appropriate regular expression to the list.

→ Banned Hosts

Banning key words

This is also a very crude measure. It’s our last automatic defense. We’ve added a few regular expressions to this list such as the Russian word for porn because we were getting vandals that posted links to forums and the like, together with some keywords, and those forum posts would then contain the link to the material we wanted to ban. The indirection via forum, URL shortener and the like circumvented our earlier ban mechanisms. This was our solution.

→ Banned Regexps

Mass Rollback

If we’re under a large scale attack, we can always lock the wiki and wait. Once the damage is done, however, we can reset the wiki to a particular edit, generating the appropriate rollbacks for every page (i.e. these rollbacks are all regular edits and can again be undone by other administrators).

There are also other defense mechanisms unrelated to banning.


We only ask for a CAPTCHA once. Answering the question sets a cookie that bypasses the CAPTCHA. Clearly, this only works for a low profile site.

→ reCaptcha Extension

Surge Protection

If you load too many pages in a short time window, the wiki will start responding with error messages, assuming that you’re a bot and not a human.

→ Surge Protection

Missing features

There is currently no way to automatically ban the entire IP range given an IP number.

There is currently a semi-automatic expiry process for bans. It would be better if this was automatic. These days I have to run a whois query, type the two IP numbers into my little Python programm, and type the result into my .htaccess file.

There used to be a ban network sharing those regular expression lists but it was brittle and so I abandoned it.


Comments on 2015-03-10 Fighting Wiki Spam

Great post.

There is one thing about Soft Security that makes me feel worried. What if some insane person wants to terrorize the wiki? That is, a directional attack, without links, without keywords, from different IPs. And all that stuff is mixed with minor edits, impersonation and malicious rollbacks. The only way to undo this mess it to restore the content from a backup (which is rather easy to do with the git extension I use, but it is still a pain).

The only thing that prevents this is the lack of motivation (which is somewhat associated with the absence of competition), but I’m not sure if that applies to all other wikis out there.

AlexDaniel 2015-03-10 23:55 UTC

Alex Schroeder
Here are my disorganized thoughts on the limits of Soft Security.

I think we can talk about two different kinds of attacks: a long term infiltration under the radar and a massive attack on multiple levels. Both attacks need to be stopped by fish-bowling the wiki: making it read-only.

In order to detect long term infiltration, you need constant peer review. I myself have bookmarks for my wikis, obviously. They all look like this:;showedit=1;days=3;rollback=1;lang=;css= or similar. I want to see rollbacks and minor edits! This is important.

Clearly, Soft Security does not work as well if the community is small, visits rarely, or if there are long periods of inactivity.

In order to defend against sudden onslaughts, the ability to lock the wiki needs to be available to a lot of people that are constantly watching. You also need the ability to mass revert the vandalism. If your site does not provide this, restoring from backup will be necessary.

  1. Do you know how to lock the wiki? It must also be easy to unlock—easy enough for your friends to do it, hard enough to prevent the vandals from doing it.
  2. Oddmuse has the ability to mass revert vandalism, but only up to the “keep days” window (14 days by default). This time window is important: Do you check at least once in this window? Including holidays and business trips?
  3. Do you have backups from various points in time?

In a way, for small communities using Soft Security, defense in depth now means defense in time.

For Campaign Wiki, for example, there is a way for people to lock and unlock a wiki. The setting is easy enough to find (I hope) but hidden well enough to elude casual spammers.

There are limits to Soft Security, however. Looking at the abuse Anita Sarkeesian endures every week makes me think that perhaps Soft Security wouldn’t work for her. Then again, perhaps we would learn that many more people support her, defending her site against the trolls?

– Alex Schroeder 2015-03-11 09:47 UTC

Add Comment

2011-01-24 Spam

Wow, what a spam storm! I rolled back all those changes and locked the wiki for the moment. There’s no fighting a bot manually. :)

I’ll look into what allowed this to happen later today and hopefully enable page editing and commenting again. ;-)

Update: IP number blocked, lock removed. That was weird. :vee:


Add Comment

2010-09-20 New Spam

Wow, spammers are learning about role playing games…

Generic Viagra has left a new comment on the post “The Dismal Depths”:
you have a special talent to design map for role games, maybe you can design a map that I need to my quest, I don’t have the talent that you posses, my map is about a adventure in one of the dangerous island of the world, R’lyeh the rest place of the great old one Cthulhu.
Buy Viagra Cheap Viagra.
Post a comment.
Unsubscribe to comments on this post.
Posted by Generic Viagra to Sham’s Grog ‘n Blog at September 20, 2010 1:25 PM

I still hate spammers, of course. But I have to confess, an adventure “on the most dangerous island of the world, R’lyeh, the resting place of the great old one, Cthulhu.” Just, wow! Or woe, I guess.


Comments on 2010-09-20 New Spam

Somehow I’d expect the spammers to know all about Cthulhu. And Nyarlathotep, of course!

RadomirDopieralski 2010-09-20 20:20 UTC

That is kind of awesome. But also terrifying, in a “from a time beyond space” kind of way.

– Adrian 2010-09-20 21:27 UTC

Add Comment

2009-07-29 Best Essays Spam

I’ve started to note a particularly nasty kind of spam for the Best Essays website. They don’t only add links to the wiki pages. At first they posted entire new pages that are on the topic of writing essays to CommunityWiki. But lately they’ve been using my username (!) to make edits. I assume they’re trying to sidestep peer review. I’ve just silently rolled back any changes they made, but today I saw another edit using my username, and when I investigated I found how they had experimented with the rollback function themselves and linked to an old revision containing a spam link to Best Term Papers. There must be real humans at work.

How annoying.


Add Comment

2009-06-06 Spam Makes Sending Mail Harder

Here I am trying to send mail using some Perl module. But most of them seem to be written for the last millenium. They work best with a local SMTP host. For my own needs, that no longer works. The webhost doesn’t have a sendmail binary available. The SMTP hosts I can reach require SSL and TLS authentication. Now I’m slowly digging into MIME::Entity, Mail::Internet, Mail::Mailer, Net::SMTP, Net::SMTP::SSL, Net::SMTP::TLS… :( :sucks:

After experimenting with the four or five mail accounts I have access to, I was finally able to get the following to work:

my $from = '';
my $to = $from;
my $host = '';
my $user = 'alex';
my $password = '*secret*';

use MIME::Entity;
my $mail = new MIME::Entity->build(To => $to,
				   From => $from,
				   Subject => 'test',
				   Path => '/Users/alex/test.html',
				   Type => 'text/html');

use Net::SMTP::TLS;
my $smtp = Net::SMTP::TLS->new($host,
			       User => $user,
			       Password => $password,
			       Debug => 1);
$smtp->mail($from); # sender
$smtp->to($to);     # recipient


Comments on 2009-06-06 Spam Makes Sending Mail Harder

Well, theoretically at least it should now be possible to subscribe to comment pages!

AlexSchroeder 2009-06-06 16:43 UTC

Guess not, because the webhost doesn’t have Net::SMTP::TLS installed. sucks

AlexSchroeder 2009-06-06 16:58 UTC

I think it works after all! Luckily I wrote my script such that it gets the page content and subscriber list via ordinary HTTP requests, so the cron job that sends out emails can run anywhere on the net. This one is running on a server hosted by Eggplant Farms.

AlexSchroeder 2009-06-07 13:25 UTC

Add Comment

2008-01-12 Yahoo Spam

Often I log on to my various instant messaging networks (→ Contact) and some dummy Yahoo account will send me spam. Something like the following:

11:58 twilaja
w<#988621>ant t<#D20057>o kno<#313821>w m<#010152>e bet<#216765>ter? check webs<#652542>ite o<#c76105>ut <#562571>http:<#d01016>//w<#947328>ww.JAC<#c41284>KIE<#e00611>-WE<#F00257>BC<#124045>AM<#A67748>.COM


Add Comment

2007-10-29 Microsoft Spam Filter

Back at work… got over 10’000 spam emails in my Junk folder, and about 300 mails in my Inbox with a 50:50 mix of spam to ham. Not too shabbby and lots better than in previous years! :)


Add Comment

2007-10-09 Goole Mail Spam

I switched to GMail a long time ago because I felt that GMail had superior anti spam measures in place. These days I’m not so sure. I have less mail in my Spam box (4065 right now), and yet I have to manually mark about a dozen mails as spam every day. Are other users poisoning the spam filters? Maybe inactive accounts gathering spam negatively affect the filters…

Tags: RSS

Comments on 2007-10-09 Goole Mail Spam

I find that too. I think the evil spam zombies are getting clever, that’s all.

Give it time and gmail with fix that. Until next time, of course. :(

greywulf 2007-10-10 12:08 UTC

I’ using gmx and are very happy with it. SPAMs only at the beginning and in the last couple of months N O N E !!! Maybe I’m just not using the mail enough… :-)

– Belfin 2007-10-11 01:34 UTC

Yeah, my email address is all over Usenet – and has been since 2003.

AlexSchroeder 2007-10-11 09:15 UTC

Add Comment

2007-04-24 Wiki Spam By Idiots

Well, I’m being hit by spam of the form

gdufty upibhmf fknwvl aixqf gumi pqrjxfb ntscbzoyp
-- [ krwfuq qeysb] 2007-04-24 15:27 UTC


egzp supbvqnf qbgtfnyv bmilfzo ewfhl xospqz rtmxfbajo
-- [ mvny vqahjngdu] 2007-04-24 15:28 UTC

How stupid is that?

Unfortunately, that means you’ll have to answer a question when you try to post to this site. :(


Add Comment

2006-08-07 Reverted Spam Still Breaks My RSS Feed

When an idiot comes along and spams twenty pages on my site, I can easily roll it back. But all changes are recorded for posterity in the log files, and therefore they appear on RecentChanges and thus also in the RSS feed. Too bad!

Unfortunatly simplistic schemes won’t work: I cannot skip all entries whose last edit was a rollback. I need to figure out what edits where undone by the rollback and then check whether there are any remaining edits in the current time window… Damn!


Comments on 2006-08-07 Reverted Spam Still Breaks My RSS Feed

Didn’t CapnDan complain about it some time ago?

TheSheep 2006-08-07 16:10 UTC

Add Comment


Other stuff

Define external redirect: CommunityWiki